01 April 2007
Se publican artículos y comentarios bilingües. Solicitamos sus contribuciones.
Previous Posts
- Fighting Fund: with thanks
- Unfair Dismissal: settlement
- Chronology of dismissal
- Letters of protest
- Tariq Ali supports campaign
- ¡A Cazar Brujas! (Spanish & English)
- Preston Reservoir Progress Assoc.
- Great Debate II
- Neocons & University Politics
- RMIT NTEU branch meeting
About Me
- Name: Defend Our Universities committee
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
This group of political activists, students and intellectuals formed in October 2005, initially to fight the political dismissal of Hispanic Studies academic Dr Robert Austin from RMIT; and highlight the neoliberal higher education agenda which it serves. Austin was sacked after shock-jock Murdoch columnist Andrew Bolt attacked his postponement of classes for interested students to join national protests in August 2005 against Voluntary Student Unionism, legislation designed to de-politicise students and erode their essential services. Articles and commentaries posted here show that RMIT management has adopted the Howard agenda of straight-jacketing academics, demonising labour activists and silencing student unions. Public universities have experienced 25 years of resource cuts, with demands from national and international capital that academics “fit” a repressive cultural agenda. We believe that only a united, creative and democratic response can reverse such attacks, stop job losses and defeat the rancid conformism which globalisation promotes. We invite you to join the struggle. ¡Venceremos!
1 Comments:
Ms Catherine Armitage, Editor,
The Australian - Higher Education Supplement
Dear Editor,
Despite its overall accuracy, Matthew Knott’s article on under-funded language courses in Australian universities (HES, 8/11/06) errs by omission on recent history at RMIT. One language program did increase its face-to-face hours last year, when its enrolments - uniquely - rose by 25 per cent: Spanish. On the program coordinator’s initiative, barely two months after his appointment, two hours of conversation class were added, providing five hours of classes per week for all Spanish higher education students at RMIT in 2005. Moreover, Dr Austin publicised the imbalance between TAFE and university sector hours among all university Spanish students, and encouraged them to pursue permanently-equal class hours using the superior TAFE benchmark. His advocacy, coupled with student pressure, then secured management agreement to trial four hours not only for Spanish, but all major university language programs, commencing 2006. But by the end of second semester 2005, he had been illegally removed as program coordinator and given six months notice: see http://www.defendrobert.blogspot.com/
Management never provided a reason for dismissal, recently settled under Unfair Dismissal legislation in the Industrial Commission. Ironically, his probation report acknowledges “excellent” research performance and “commendable” teaching, leading to a “considerably more attractive” Spanish program. However, the rapid and major improvements (eg first-time overseas scholarships, academic upgrading of staff, smaller classes, staff-student exchange programs with Latin American and Spanish universities, curriculum reform) unnerved vested interests in management, as did his Left political leanings. Management's counter-reform includes dropping the PhD requirement in the new job ad, and replacement with “completing a doctoral thesis within five years of appointment”. This demeans the students and is scandalous, more so given the number of semi-employed and unemployed PhDs in the field of Hispanic Studies, both locally and overseas.
As one senior student wrote to the vice chancellor in a letter representative of several hundred others, she had been "amazed by the enormous improvements that Robert has made to the program in the short time he has been here", lamenting in a separate message that "despite protests from virtually every student of the Spanish department, not to mention many more, the decision on (his) dismissal has not been reversed." Another senior student prepared a court deposition swearing that the head of school who recommended dismissal “admitted (to a student delegation) that he had not followed procedure in relation to Dr. Austin’s probation ... and admitted that in future he would pursue such matters only through the legitimate channels. This admission contradicts stories around the school to the effect that everything was above board.”
Viviana Ramírez
Voluntary tutor in Spanish, RMIT (2005)
20 November 2006
14 April, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home